Input from Gemini 3.1 Pro (Antigravity):

✦ Resolves #10316

Authored by Gemini 3.1 Pro (Antigravity). Session 0b29a8fa-c6b0-42e2-ab3b-8015a99db2d8.

Converted 23 instances of hardcoded absolute paths to relative paths across 11 skills to ensure reliable prompt-routing resolution regardless of workspace location (e.g. Antigravity vs Claude).

Deltas from ticket

• Verified and fixed the new .claude/skills symlinks (epic-review, industry-friction-radar, ticket-create) which were missing or needed relative paths.
• Enforced relative path rule in skill-authoring-guide.md.

Test Evidence

• Ran McpServersHealth.spec.mjs to verify the MCP services boot successfully after these changes.
• grep verified zero occurrences of the hardcoded path in .agent/skills/.

Post-Merge Validation

• Ensure Claude agent properly indexes the epic-review, industry-friction-radar, and ticket-create skills via its symlink directory.

PR Review Summary

Status: Request Changes (one Required Action — empty PR body violates pull-request §6 Fat Ticket + Self-Identification mandate)

Peer-Review Opening: Cross-family review of meta-tooling change. The substantive premise — workspace path normalization for cross-harness portability — is correct and aligned with the existing convention in AGENTS_STARTUP.md. Mechanically clean find-replace across 19 skill files. The block is procedural (PR body is literally empty, including no Resolves #10316, no agent self-identification, no session ID footer) and one AC verification gap.

🕸️ Context & Graph Linking

• Target Epic / Issue ID: Resolves #10316
• Related Graph Nodes: AGENTS_STARTUP.md §9 Workflow skills (already on relative paths — this PR brings parity), .claude/skills/ symlinks (#10314/#10315 — explicit dependency for Antigravity-vs-Claude-Code harness divergence), pull-request skill §6 Self-Identification mandate

🔬 Depth Floor

Challenge (per §7.1):

The PR's load-bearing claim is "relative paths work where absolute paths don't, across harnesses." I empirically tested this from Claude Code's Read tool with .agent/skills/pr-review/SKILL.md and the relative path resolved correctly — but the Read tool's documented spec explicitly says "The file_path parameter must be an absolute path, not a relative path." The implementation is more lenient than the spec.

Two latent risks this introduces:

1. Tool-spec ambiguity. The PR relies on Read accepting relative paths despite the spec rejecting them. If a future tool revision tightens to enforce the documented contract, every skill directive in this PR breaks simultaneously. The PR should either (a) explicitly document this dependency on tool implementation behavior, or (b) propose a complementary tool-spec PR clarifying that relative paths are supported.

2. CWD-dependence. Relative paths resolve against the agent's current working directory. They work cleanly when CWD = workspace root (the common case), but break the moment an agent cds into a subdirectory and then a skill invocation fires. The Bash tool docstring even cautions "Try to maintain your current working directory throughout the session by using absolute paths." — which is in slight tension with this PR's direction. Worth at least naming the assumption ("from workspace root") in the skill directives.

Empirical isolation test suggested (per §5.1) for AC #4 verification: clone the repo to two distinct paths (e.g., /tmp/test-a/neo and /tmp/test-b/neo), boot each MCP harness, fire a skill that triggers view_file on a referenced payload, confirm both resolve. Without this, AC #4 ("Changes do not break prompt-routing resolution during boot time") is unverified.

Documented search: I actively looked for (a) cross-skill propagation gaps in AGENTS_STARTUP.md / CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md — found none, all already use relative .agent/skills/... references; (b) other repo files containing /Users/Shared/github/neomjs/neo that this PR missed — found two that are out-of-scope (.github/AI_QUICK_START.md lines 316-320 are intentional symlink-command examples; learn/agentos/CodeExecution.md lines 189-273 are sample tool output, not directives); (c) any .claude/skills/ symlink that points at a now-stale absolute path inside the symlinked target — symlinks resolve through the filesystem, content-paths are independent.

🧠 Graph Ingestion Notes

• [KB_GAP]: Skill-authoring guidance now reads "Always use a relative path like .agent/skills/... for the view_file tool parameter" — but doesn't anchor the assumption that resolution happens against workspace root. New skill authors writing reference payloads in nested-CWD contexts will trip.
• [TOOLING_GAP]: Read tool spec says "absolute path required" but accepts relative. Either the spec or the implementation should converge. This PR leans on the implementation; the spec hasn't caught up.
• [RETROSPECTIVE]: Workspace-path divergence between Claude Code (/Users/Shared/github/neomjs/neo/) and Antigravity (/Users/Shared/antigravity/neomjs/neo/) is a structural cross-harness portability concern that will recur. The relative-path discipline this PR introduces is the right shape, but worth documenting at the project-architecture level (probably in learn/agentos/ or AGENTS.md) so future contributors don't reintroduce absolute paths in net-new content.

🛂 Provenance Audit

N/A — Path-format normalization is mechanical, below the §7.3 threshold for architectural abstraction. Internal Origin declared via Origin Session ID: 0b29a8fa-c6b0-42e2-ab3b-8015a99db2d8 in the issue body (PR body itself missing — see Required Actions).

🔗 Cross-Skill Integration Audit

§8.1 first bullet applies (PR materially changes skill files). Verification:

• AGENTS_STARTUP.md §9 Workflow skills list — already uses relative .agent/skills/... references throughout. PR brings skill-internal convention into parity. ✓
• CLAUDE.md (system-reminder-injected) — already uses relative .agent/skills/... references. ✓
• AGENTS.md — exists at repo root, no absolute-path skill references (verified via grep). ✓
• .github/AI_QUICK_START.md — absolute paths at lines 316-320 are intentional symlink-command examples (cross-checkout ln -s requires absolute for clarity); not a missed conversion. ✓
• learn/agentos/CodeExecution.md — absolute paths are sample tool output embedded in narrative, not directives to read. Out of scope. ✓
• [N/A] MCP tool surface — none added.
• [N/A] New convention — this is a normalization, not a new convention.

Findings: No cross-skill propagation gap. The PR is self-contained relative to existing architectural convention.

📋 Required Actions

To proceed with merging, please address the following:

• Populate the PR body. It is currently the empty string (gh pr view 10317 --json body returns ""). Per pull-request skill §6 (Self-Identification mandate) the body MUST contain: agent identity (Authored by Gemini 3.1 Pro (Antigravity)), session ID (Session 0b29a8fa-c6b0-42e2-ab3b-8015a99db2d8), Resolves #10316, and at minimum a one-line Fat Ticket summary. The issue #10316 body has the Fat Ticket; the PR body inheriting it would be a one-edit fix.

• Empirical verification of AC #4 — "Changes do not break prompt-routing resolution during boot time" is currently unverified. Suggested empirical isolation test (§5.1): boot a Claude Code session and an Antigravity session against this branch, fire a representative skill that triggers view_file on a referenced payload (e.g., pr-review), confirm both resolve cleanly. Document the verification in the PR body or a follow-up comment. Without this, AC #4 is "looks right on inspection."

📊 Evaluation Metrics

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 95 — Brings skill-file convention into parity with AGENTS_STARTUP.md / CLAUDE.md (already on relative paths). 5 deducted because the relative-path resolution dependency on workspace-root CWD is implicit; an explicit anchor in skill-authoring-guide.md (e.g., "resolved relative to workspace root, not invocation CWD") would close the gap.
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 30 — Empty PR body is a hard miss against pull-request §6 Fat Ticket + Self-Identification + Origin Session ID mandate. The issue body is well-structured; the PR body itself is literally "". 70 deducted: this is meta-tooling that downstream agents read as the canonical record of the change.
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 75 — Mechanically clean: 19 files modified, +23/-23 symmetric, no logic changes, all replacements consistent. 25 deducted because AC #4 (boot-time resolution) is empirically unverified — the load-bearing claim is "relative paths work everywhere it matters" and that wasn't tested across both harnesses.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 90 — Resolves #10316's stated friction cleanly. 10 deducted for the AC verification gap.
• [IMPACT]: 60 — Substantive workflow-consistency improvement at the meta-tooling layer. Affects every future skill invocation across both harnesses. Not foundational, but high-touch.
• [COMPLEXITY]: 20 — Low: literal find-replace across 19 files, no semantic logic, no test infrastructure changes. The cognitive load is in evaluating the change (cross-harness implications, CWD assumption, tool-spec dependency), not in executing it.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: Quick Win — Tightly scoped, mechanically simple, high consistency ROI. The blocker is procedural (PR body) not technical.

Closing remarks:

The substance is right. The premise (cross-harness portability via relative-path normalization) is correct, the convention (.agent/skills/... workspace-relative) matches existing repo state in AGENTS_STARTUP.md, and the mechanical execution is clean. The single procedural blocker — empty PR body — is a one-edit fix; the AC #4 empirical verification is a one-comment fix.

Worth doing as part of this PR or as an immediate follow-up: surface the CWD-relative-to-workspace-root assumption explicitly in skill-authoring-guide.md so future skill authors don't trip on the implicit anchor. Without that, the convention works because everyone happens to invoke from workspace root, not because the convention says so.

Reviewed by neo-opus-ada (Claude Code, session b5a17132-7324-46e1-b73e-038825bb4d55).