PR Review Summary

Status: Approved

Peer-Review Opening: Thanks for putting this together! Generalizing the Resumption Protocol to cover A2A interrupts alongside human prompts is a smart and concise refinement that will improve overall swarm reliability.

🕸️ Context & Graph Linking

• Target Epic / Issue ID: Resolves #10523
• Related Graph Nodes: AGENTS.md, Resumption Protocol, interruption amnesia, A2A messages

🔬 Depth Floor

Documented search: I actively looked for any wording ambiguities or overly specific substrate constraints in the updated AGENTS.md wording, and checked the git diff for trailing whitespaces (git diff --check origin/dev...HEAD), and found no concerns.

Rhetorical-Drift Audit (per guide §7.4):

• PR description: framing matches what the diff substantiates (no overshoot)
• Anchor & Echo summaries: precise codebase terminology, no metaphor that overshoots the implementation
• [RETROSPECTIVE] tag: accurately characterizes what shipped (no inflation of architectural significance)
• Linked anchors: cited tickets/PRs actually establish the claimed pattern (no borrowed authority)

Findings: Pass

🧠 Graph Ingestion Notes

• [KB_GAP]: None
• [TOOLING_GAP]: None
• [RETROSPECTIVE]: The resumption protocol now natively handles the reality of A2A wake interruptions, ensuring the Definition of Done is checked irrespective of the source of the side-quest.

🛂 Provenance Audit

N/A - Standard documentation refinement.

🎯 Close-Target Audit

• Close-targets identified: #10523
• For each #N: confirmed not epic-labeled (or flagged as Required Action below)

Findings: Pass

📡 MCP-Tool-Description Budget Audit

N/A

🔌 Wire-Format Compatibility Audit

N/A

🔗 Cross-Skill Integration Audit

• Does any existing skill document a predecessor step that should now fire this new pattern?
• Does AGENTS_STARTUP.md §9 Workflow skills list need updating?
• Does any reference file mention a predecessor pattern that should now also mention the new one?
• If a new MCP tool is added, is it documented in the relevant skill's reference payload?
• If a new convention is introduced, is the convention documented somewhere (when it applies, how it fires)?

Findings: All checks pass — no integration gaps.

🧪 Test-Execution Audit

• Branch checked out locally (via checkout_pull_request MCP tool)
• If a test file changed: Ran the specific test file.
• If code changed: Verified if there are tests, or if new tests are needed.

Findings: No tests needed (docs change).

📋 Required Actions

No required actions — eligible for human merge.

📊 Evaluation Metrics

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 100 - Perfectly aligns with the swarm goal of ensuring A2A interruptions do not derail the PR Definition of Done.
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 100 - The two-line wording update is concise and fully satisfies the ticket scope.
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 100 - Clean diff, no trailing whitespaces, well-formed PR body.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 100 - Quick and effective resolution.
• [IMPACT]: 80 - Solid operational fix to prevent ticket abandonment after A2A side-quests.
• [COMPLEXITY]: 20 - Low complexity, localized documentation update.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: Quick Win - straightforward text update.