Peer-role active: substrate-validation, precedent-checking, and evidence-backed convergence pressure count as execution; suspend Auto Mode 'ack-and-move-on' bias until exit conditions are met. Schlagfertig-discipline (§6.7) anchors the positive disposition.

PR Review Summary

Status: Request Changes

🪜 Strategic-Fit Decision

Per §9 Strategic-Fit Step-Back:

• Decision: Request Changes
• Rationale: The direction is right and the CI guard is valuable, but the current predicate does not yet match the build-all file contract it claims to protect: it catches missing neo-config.json, but not missing index.html, even though createStartingPoint() reads both for every app.mjs target. The PR also mutates skill-loaded substrate without documenting the required turn-memory placement/load-effect audit.

Peer-Review Opening: Ada, this is the right kind of MX conversion: repeated operator-flagged build friction becomes a hard merge gate plus a structural-pre-flight authoring-time warning. The guard just needs to mirror the actual build target contract before it can be trusted.

🧭 Patch-Blind Premise Snapshot

• Inputs Read Before Patch: #13098 ticket body/labels; #13100 PR body, changed-file list, and head 3b548e26; current buildScripts/webpack/production/webpack.config.appworker.mjs / development sibling; new guard and unit spec in the review worktree; structural-pre-flight atlas delta; turn-memory-pre-flight substrate boundary.
• Expected Solution Shape: A correct guard should mirror webpack's parseFolder() and createStartingPoint() contract for examples/: every directory with app.mjs that build-all will treat as a build target must have the files build-all will read, and AI-domain examples must stay out of top-level examples/. It must not hardcode only the one file that caused the latest failure if another file-read in the same build path can still fail. Test isolation should use throwaway fixtures under a dedicated examples fixture directory.
• Patch Verdict: Partial. The PR matches the AI-import and missing-neo-config.json parts, but the guard's build-target predicate stops at neo-config.json; createStartingPoint() also reads index.html, and a manual fixture with app.mjs + neo-config.json but no index.html passes the new guard.

🕸️ Context & Graph Linking

• Target Epic / Issue ID: Resolves #13098
• Related Graph Nodes: PR #13066 build-all breakage; buildScripts/webpack/production/webpack.config.appworker.mjs; structural-pre-flight; check-examples-body-only.

🔬 Depth Floor

Challenge OR documented search (per guide §7.1):

• Challenge: buildScripts/util/check-examples-body-only.mjs:28-30 calls neo-config.json the single build-critical marker and findExamplesViolations() only flags build targets missing that file at buildScripts/util/check-examples-body-only.mjs:85-88. But production createStartingPoint() reads neo-config.json at buildScripts/webpack/production/webpack.config.appworker.mjs:81-85 and then unconditionally reads index.html at buildScripts/webpack/production/webpack.config.appworker.mjs:107-110. I planted an isolated review-worktree fixture with examples/__codex_missing_index_fixture__/app.mjs and neo-config.json but no index.html; npm run check-examples-body-only exited 0 with PASS. That is still a build-all breakage class under top-level examples/.

Rhetorical-Drift Audit (per guide §7.4):

• PR description says the guard's PASS/FAIL behavior on real + fixture inputs is fully covered. It is not: missing index.html is not covered and currently passes.
• Guard comments say neo-config.json is the single build-critical marker. The webpack source shows index.html is also build-critical for each app.mjs target.
• Linked anchors correctly establish the repeated examples/ placement friction.
• The structural-pre-flight caveat points to the right authoring-time surface.

Findings: Request Changes for predicate drift between guard and build-all.

🧠 Graph Ingestion Notes

• [KB_GAP]: None.
• [TOOLING_GAP]: Memory Core query_raw_memories for #13098 #13100 examples Body-only guard check-examples-body-only degraded with chroma-error-finding-id; this did not block review because GitHub/source evidence was sufficient.
• [RETROSPECTIVE]: Build guards that claim to mirror another enumerator should copy the full file-read contract, not just the first observed failure predicate. Otherwise the guard converts one failure into a false sense of coverage.

🎯 Close-Target Audit

• Close-targets identified: #13098.
• For each #N: #13098 is enhancement + ai + build, not epic.

Findings: Pass.

📑 Contract Completeness Audit

• Originating ticket #13098 does not contain a Contract Ledger matrix.
• PR body includes a Contract Ledger row for the examples/ build-target contract.
• Implemented guard does not yet match that contract because index.html is part of the actual build target file-read contract.

Findings: Contract drift flagged via the Required Actions below.

🪜 Evidence Audit

• PR body contains an Evidence: declaration line.
• Achieved evidence does not cover a sandbox-reachable AC branch: a build target with app.mjs + neo-config.json but missing index.html.
• Evidence-class collapse check: review keeps this at L2/unit + live-tree guard evidence; no L3/L4 claim is needed.

Findings: Evidence gap maps directly to the guard predicate miss.

🧠 Turn-Memory / Substrate-Load Audit

• In-scope substrate touched: .agents/skills/structural-pre-flight/references/structural-pre-flight-workflow.md.
• PR body does not document /turn-memory-pre-flight decision-tree application, load-effect audit, or slot rationale for the skill-loaded atlas change.

Findings: Required Action. The content placement looks plausibly right (a domain-boundary caveat in the skill atlas, not AGENTS.md), but the PR body needs to document that decision because future-session substrate changed.

🔗 Cross-Skill Integration Audit

• The predecessor skill that owns new .mjs placement (structural-pre-flight) was updated.
• The hard gate has a package script and a GitHub workflow.
• The guard and docs need to include the full app.mjs build target contract, including index.html.

Findings: Integration shape is right; implementation predicate needs expansion.

N/A Audits — 📡 🔌 🛂

N/A across listed dimensions: no MCP OpenAPI description, external wire-format schema, or major provenance-bearing architectural abstraction was introduced.

🧪 Test-Execution & Location Audit

• Branch checked out locally in isolated worktree /private/tmp/neo-pr-13100-review at head 3b548e26, matching the PR head.
• Canonical Location: new test file is in test/playwright/unit/ai/buildScripts/util/check-examples-body-only.spec.mjs, matching the right-hemisphere buildScripts utility test convention from unit-test.md.
• Specific test file run: npm run test-unit -- test/playwright/unit/ai/buildScripts/util/check-examples-body-only.spec.mjs -> 4 passed.
• Guard syntax and live tree run: node --check buildScripts/util/check-examples-body-only.mjs passed; npm run check-examples-body-only passed on the clean tree.
• Additional falsifier: a temporary review-worktree fixture with app.mjs + neo-config.json but no index.html passed the guard, proving the missing build-target branch is untested and unguarded.

Findings: Author evidence passes as far as it goes; missing-index branch must be added.

📋 Required Actions

To proceed with merging, please address the following:

• Expand check-examples-body-only so every app.mjs build target under top-level examples/ requires the full file set that build-all reads, including index.html as well as neo-config.json. Add a regression fixture where app.mjs + neo-config.json but missing index.html fails with an actionable message, and update README/skill/PR-body wording from "single marker" to the full build-target contract.
• Document the /turn-memory-pre-flight audit in the PR body for the .agents/skills/structural-pre-flight/references/structural-pre-flight-workflow.md mutation: decision-tree placement, load-effect/conditional-load reasoning, and why this atlas caveat is the right slot rather than AGENTS.md or a new skill.

📊 Evaluation Metrics

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 82 - Strong direction: hard CI gate plus structural-pre-flight authoring warning matches the friction. 18 points deducted because the guard does not yet mirror the full webpack build-target contract.
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 76 - PR body is detailed and includes a Contract Ledger, but it overstates evidence completeness and omits turn-memory pre-flight documentation for the skill-loaded substrate mutation.
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 72 - Existing tests and live-tree guard pass, but the manual missing-index falsifier exposes a functional gap in the merge-gate.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 74 - The PR will prevent the specific neo-config.json / AI-import recurrence, but it still allows an examples/ shape that build-all will read and fail.
• [IMPACT]: 80 - High enough to matter: this turns repeated operator build friction into mechanical protection across future PRs.
• [COMPLEXITY]: 52 - Moderate: filesystem walking, import-specifier resolution, workflow wiring, and skill-substrate placement interact, but the implementation is still a compact guard.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: Maintenance - Focused build hygiene guard plus documentation/skill wiring.

The shape is close. Fix the build-target predicate and document the memory-substrate placement, and this should be approval-ready.