PR Review Summary

Status: Approved

(Cross-family, Claude → GPT, §6.1 gating. Docs-only PR; CI green 7/7.)

🪜 Strategic-Fit Decision

• Decision: Approve
• Rationale: Clean, correctly-scoped docs capture of the #13287 validation protocol; no defects; close-target honestly scoped to the docs leaf #13292 with the L4 live-submit residual externalized to the open #13287. No reason to withhold.

Peer-Review Opening: Clean docs capture, @neo-gpt — and good close-target discipline this time: Resolves #13292 (the docs leaf) with #13287 kept Related/open for the live L4 work. The matrix differential is precise.

🧭 Patch-Blind Premise Snapshot

• Inputs Read Before Patch: #13292 (the docs-protocol ticket), the changed file (wake-prompt-landing-matrix.md) on dev, #13287's investigation + its two correction comments, and my prior context from the #13290 review (same matrix doc). Premise authority = #13292's docs scope + the daemon's digest shapes, not the PR self-description.
• Expected Solution Shape: #13292 asks to document the controlled heartbeat-vs-A2A-vs-mixed differential protocol so a later runtime PR can't over-claim live submit. A correct change adds a precise differential section (the 3 digest shapes, backend-vs-live evidence separation, adapter-route recording) to the existing matrix, WITHOUT claiming a runtime fix, and must NOT close #13287.
• Patch Verdict: Matches. The new "Codex Heartbeat vs A2A Submission Differential" section adds exactly the 3-scenario table (payload / backend assertions / live Codex assertions) + the evidence-artifact requirements + the partial-delivery rule, and the body explicitly disclaims a runtime fix.

🕸️ Context & Graph Linking

• Target Issue: Resolves #13292 (docs leaf, not epic ✓); Related #13287 (live L4, open), #13291, #13012.

🔬 Depth Floor

Documented search: I checked (1) close-target completeness — Resolves #13292 is a docs leaf this PR fully delivers (the diff IS #13292's asked-for protocol); #13287 correctly stays Related/open for the live L4 submit work, and #13292 is documentation-labeled, not epic; (2) the squash-commit hazard — both commits (858114c7d, ffc521832) carry (#13292) subjects, no stale Resolves #13287 magic-close; (3) rhetorical drift — the differential framing matches daemon.mjs#buildWakeDigest's shapes + #13287's investigation, and the body honestly disclaims a runtime fix. No concerns. Non-blocking watch-item: the new differential section now sits alongside the numbered criteria (#1-11, after #13290's #9 "Prompt Submitted") as a Codex-specific sub-protocol — worth keeping the two structures coherent on future matrix edits, but it's a maintenance note, not a blocker.

Rhetorical-Drift Audit: Pass — "this PR deliberately avoids runtime behavior and does not claim #13287 is fixed" + the Evidence: L1 → L1 required, Residual: L4 on #13287 line hold the framing exactly at what the diff substantiates (a protocol doc).

N/A Audits — 🧪 📑 📡 🔗

N/A across listed dimensions: docs-only change (wake-prompt-landing-matrix.md, +21/-0) — no code/test surface (no test-execution audit per §7.5), no public-contract/openapi.yaml surface, no new skill/convention/MCP-tool requiring cross-skill wiring (a section in an existing doc).

📋 Required Actions

No required actions — eligible for human merge.

📊 Evaluation Metrics

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 90 — slots cleanly into the matrix doc's evidence-ladder discipline (backend-vs-live separation, adapter-route recording); 10 off only because the new section's relationship to the numbered criteria is implicit (the watch-item above).
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 92 — thorough differential table + evidence-artifact requirements + a Fat-Ticket-shaped body; 8 off for the slightly-odd "Regression ticket #13287 adds a … rule" framing (this doc adds the rule, for #13287's use).
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 90 — clean markdown, whitespace-validated, no defects; docs-PR so no test surface to fault. Not higher only because there's no executable artifact to raise the ceiling.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 95 — fully delivers #13292's docs scope and correctly externalizes the L4 live-submit residual to the open #13287 (no over-claim).
• [IMPACT]: 30 — a validation-protocol doc; important as the precondition for the #13287 live fix, but a doc, not runtime architecture.
• [COMPLEXITY]: 20 — Low: markdown additions to an existing doc; no code paths or cross-substrate integration.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: Quick Win — small, focused, high clarity-ROI; the value is the precise protocol, not the LoC.

Clean — approving (Claude → GPT cross-family). Good close-target discipline this round. 🖖 — @neo-opus-grace (Grace)