PR Review Summary

Status: Request Changes

🪜 Strategic-Fit Decision

Per §9 Strategic-Fit Step-Back:

• Decision: Request Changes
• Rationale: The skill shape is broadly correct and high-value for the active v13.1 planning goal, but the newly added workflow payload contains a stale cloud-roadmap issue anchor in the worked example. Because this is future-loaded skill substrate, the stale anchor should be corrected before merge rather than shipped as a known-poisoned example.

Thanks for putting this together. The Map/Atlas split is the right shape for this post-release planning beat, and the steward/deferred-set language matches the operator’s current scope pressure well. I found one narrow blocking issue in the illustrative v13.1 example.

🧭 Patch-Blind Premise Snapshot

• Inputs Read Before Patch: Issue #13380 body and T3 Contract Ledger comment; create-skill skill-authoring guide; turn-memory-pre-flight workflow; epic-create workflow; pr-review guide/template; live PR metadata/checks; live issue states for #11720, #10291, and #13380; exact-head local review worktree at 9cbb53c60a787564623a87c98d23c3f16edd3010.
• Expected Solution Shape: A correct update-roadmap skill should keep only trigger routing in SKILL.md, move the post-release planning body into references/, link roadmap scope through milestone/epic relationships rather than prose registries, and preserve flat-peer steward self-selection. It must not hardcode stale live-registry state into future guidance, and test isolation should be limited to skill-manifest lint plus docs/symlink checks.
• Patch Verdict: Mostly matches: the router/payload split, manifest mirror, Claude symlink, downstream docs, and Contract Ledger are present. One worked-example anchor contradicts live issue state and needs correction before this becomes durable skill guidance.

🕸️ Context & Graph Linking

• Target Epic / Issue ID: Resolves #13380
• Related Graph Nodes: update-roadmap, create-skill, turn-memory-pre-flight, epic-create, v13.1-roadmap

🔬 Depth Floor

Challenge: The worked example is explicitly “illustrative, NOT the live registry,” but it still names concrete issue anchors. I verified live state: #11720 is CLOSED and epic-labeled, while #10291 is the OPEN cloud-phase epic. Carrying #11720 into the skill payload would make future roadmap runs inherit stale cloud scope even though the skill’s own purpose is to prevent stale roadmap prose.

Rhetorical-Drift Audit (per guide §7.4):

• PR description: framing matches the diff’s skill substrate and does not overstate runtime behavior.
• Anchor & Echo summaries: no code JSDoc involved; skill prose uses the established Map/Atlas vocabulary.
• [RETROSPECTIVE] tag: not used.
• Linked anchors: one cited worked-example anchor is stale: #11720 is closed, while #10291 is the live cloud-phase anchor.

Findings: Blocking drift in the worked example’s cloud anchor.

🧠 Graph Ingestion Notes

• [KB_GAP]: None.
• [TOOLING_GAP]: Codex sandbox GitHub API reads still intermittently fail with error connecting to api.github.com; live/escalated reads and the GitHub workflow MCP review path are usable.
• [RETROSPECTIVE]: The update-roadmap shape is a strong substrate answer to the post-release planning gap: it keeps release scope as milestone-linked cornerstones plus rationale, not a stale prose work registry.

🎯 Close-Target Audit

• Close-targets identified: #13380
• For #13380: confirmed labels are enhancement, ai, model-experience; not epic.

Findings: Pass. PR body has newline-isolated Resolves #13380; branch commit message does not contain a magic close keyword.

📑 Contract Completeness Audit

• Originating ticket contains a T3 Contract Ledger matrix as an issue comment.
• Implemented PR diff matches the ledger surfaces: router, workflow payload, #10321 relationship-only stance, manifest/docs, and Claude symlink.

Findings: Pass.

🪜 Evidence Audit

• PR body contains an Evidence: declaration line.
• L1 evidence is appropriate for skill/docs substrate with no runtime-verify ACs.
• No residual runtime ACs claimed.
• Evidence-class collapse check passes: review language does not promote lint/static evidence to runtime validation.

Findings: Pass.

🧠 Turn-Memory / Substrate-Load Audit

The PR modifies .agents/skills/** and .claude/skills/**, so this audit fires.

• PR body documents the placement decision tree: Step 2 lifecycle-event skill, not AGENTS.md or Atlas.
• PR body documents Map vs World Atlas split: lightweight SKILL.md router plus references/update-roadmap-workflow.md payload.
• Net always-loaded delta is bounded to one router plus manifest mirror; rule body is conditional.
• Related lint verified locally at exact head: node ai/scripts/lint/lint-skill-manifest.mjs --base origin/dev → [lint-skill-manifest] OK.
• Claude symlink verified locally: .claude/skills/update-roadmap → ../../.agents/skills/update-roadmap.

Findings: Pass.

🔗 Cross-Skill Integration Audit

• New skill follows existing create-skill shape: frontmatter router plus reference payload.
• skills.manifest.json mirrors the skill and declares governance fields.
• Downstream docs are updated in learn/agentos/ProgressiveDisclosureSkills.md and learn/guides/fundamentals/CodebaseOverview.md.
• The skill references existing lifecycle siblings instead of duplicating epic-create, epic-resolution, or release-cut mechanics.

Findings: Pass.

🧪 Test-Execution & Location Audit

• Branch checked out locally in a detached review worktree under tmp/review-13389.
• Exact local head verified: 9cbb53c60a787564623a87c98d23c3f16edd3010.
• Related lint executed: node ai/scripts/lint/lint-skill-manifest.mjs --base origin/dev → OK.
• No Playwright run required: docs/skill substrate only, no .mjs runtime code or test files changed.

Findings: Pass.

N/A Audits — 📡 🛂 🔌

N/A across listed dimensions: no OpenAPI tool descriptions, no external-origin major architectural abstraction, and no wire-format/database/tool-signature changes.

📋 Required Actions

To proceed with merging, please address the following:

• Update .agents/skills/update-roadmap/references/update-roadmap-workflow.md worked example so the cloud stability cornerstone uses the live open cloud-phase anchor #10291, not closed epic #11720. Because the section says it is illustrative rather than the live registry, also backtick descriptive issue tokens in that worked-example paragraph where they are context rather than intentional relationship edges.

📊 Evaluation Metrics

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 90 - 10 points deducted for the stale worked-example anchor; the core Map/Atlas split, linked-not-listed roadmap model, self-selected stewardship, and quorum-first graduation rule are otherwise aligned with the existing skill substrate.
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 85 - 15 points deducted because the payload’s illustrative snapshot includes one stale live-state reference; the source ticket, Contract Ledger, PR body, and workflow payload otherwise cover the required rationale, avoided traps, and verification checklist.
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 85 - 15 points deducted for the incorrect cloud issue anchor in future-loaded guidance; exact-head lint and symlink checks pass, and no runtime code was changed.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 85 - 15 points deducted until the worked-example anchor is corrected; the PR otherwise delivers the requested update-roadmap skill from #13380.
• [IMPACT]: 70 - This is a release-lifecycle governance skill that can materially improve v13.1 planning, but it is not a runtime subsystem or public API.
• [COMPLEXITY]: 35 - Low-to-moderate: one new skill with router/payload/docs/symlink integration; the main complexity is substrate placement and future-session load effect, not code behavior.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: Quick Win - Small diff with high coordination value once the stale example anchor is corrected.

The requested fix is narrow. After that correction and a rerun of lint-skill-manifest, I expect this to be mergeable.

PR Review Follow-Up Summary

Status: Request Changes

Cycle: Cycle 2 follow-up / re-review

Opening: Follow-up on prior review PRR_kwDODSospM8AAAABDFHJ0g: the stale cloud anchor blocker is fixed, but the live discussion-state sweep surfaced one remaining wording blocker in the same worked-example paragraph.

Patch-Blind Premise Snapshot

• Inputs Read Before Patch: Prior review PRR_kwDODSospM8AAAABDFHJ0g, updated head 8d7a446061aab7c2a0b3d37afbc3b5e87bafaec4, delta from old head 9cbb53c60a787564623a87c98d23c3f16edd3010, current PR checks, turn-memory-pre-flight workflow, create-skill authoring guide, and fresh Discussion reads for #13378 / #13374 from the adjacent #13393 roadmap review.
• Expected Solution Shape: The follow-up should correct the stale cloud anchor to live #10291, keep descriptive issue tokens backticked in the illustrative paragraph, and preserve the skill's own “drive graduations to quorum first” rule. It must not encode unresolved discussions as already-graduated examples.
• Patch Verdict: The prior blocker is addressed exactly: #11720 became #10291, and descriptive issue tokens are backticked. One wording mismatch remains: the worked example still calls #13378 and #13374 “the 3 latest-Discussion graduations,” while their live discussion ledgers have not graduated.

Strategic-Fit Decision

Per §9 Strategic-Fit Step-Back:

• Decision: Request Changes
• Rationale: This is still a narrow fix, not a premise rejection. The skill is valuable and structurally correct, but the worked example must not teach future roadmap runs to treat pending discussions as graduated.

Prior Review Anchor

• PR: #13389
• Target Issue: #13380
• Prior Review Comment ID: PRR_kwDODSospM8AAAABDFHJ0g
• Author Response Comment ID: N/A — fixup commit only
• Latest Head SHA: 8d7a44606

Delta Scope

• Files changed: .agents/skills/update-roadmap/references/update-roadmap-workflow.md
• PR body / close-target changes: unchanged; Resolves #13380 remains valid.
• Branch freshness / merge state: live PR is OPEN at 8d7a446061aab7c2a0b3d37afbc3b5e87bafaec4; current checks pass.

Previous Required Actions Audit

• Addressed: “Update worked example so the cloud stability cornerstone uses live open cloud-phase anchor #10291, not closed epic #11720, and backtick descriptive issue tokens.” — Evidence: delta changes line 49 to use #10291 and backticks the worked-example issue tokens.

Delta Depth Floor

Delta challenge: The corrected worked example still uses completed-state wording for not-yet-graduated discussions. Fresh reads show Discussion #13378 remains [GRADUATION_DEFERRED] pending OQ2 mechanism selection and OQ4 undo/replay, and Discussion #13374 says it remains high-blast / not graduation-ready pending public non-author signal and epic-create. That conflicts with the skill's own rule at line 21: drive graduations to quorum first; never rubber-stamp a graduation to fit a roadmap.

Conditional Audit Delta

🧠 Turn-Memory / Substrate-Load Audit

• Findings: Map/Atlas placement remains correct; no new always-loaded payload was added. The blocker is content accuracy inside the conditional reference payload.

🔗 Cross-Skill Integration Audit

• Findings: The workflow's core rule correctly references ideation-sandbox quorum discipline, but the worked example needs matching state vocabulary so it does not undermine that rule.

Test-Execution & Location Audit

• Changed surface class: skill payload Markdown only.
• Location check: pass; existing reference payload location remains canonical.
• Related verification run: node ai/scripts/lint/lint-skill-manifest.mjs --base origin/dev → OK. Current gh pr checks 13389 --json name,state,startedAt,completedAt,workflow,bucket → all pass.
• Findings: pass for mechanics; content-state wording still needs correction.

Contract Completeness Audit

• Findings: Pass on the original source-ticket surfaces after the cloud-anchor fix; remaining gap is the worked-example graduation-state wording.

Metrics Delta

Metrics are unchanged from the prior review unless an explicit delta is listed below.

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 90 -> 85 - prior cloud-anchor deduction is resolved, but 5 points remain deducted because the worked example now conflicts with the skill's own quorum-first graduation rule.
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 85 -> 80 - the stale cloud anchor is fixed, but content still overstates #13378 / #13374 graduation state.
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 85 -> 85 - unchanged in net: lint/checks pass and mechanics are sound; blocker is content accuracy.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 85 -> 80 - the skill is close, but should not close until the worked example state vocabulary is corrected.
• [IMPACT]: unchanged from prior review - release-lifecycle governance skill with material planning value.
• [COMPLEXITY]: unchanged from prior review - small skill/docs delta.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: unchanged from prior review - Quick Win.

Required Actions

To proceed with merging, please address the following:

• Change the worked-example wording around #13378 and #13374 from completed “graduations” to accurate state language, for example “latest Discussion graduation targets / convergence inputs,” unless/until their public Signal Ledgers actually clear. Keep the line compatible with the rule at workflow line 21: “must be included” means drive to quorum, not force past the consensus gate.

A2A Hand-Off

I will send this reviewId to Ada via A2A after posting.