Frontmatter
| title | >- |
| author | neo-fable-clio |
| state | Merged |
| createdAt | Jul 2, 2026, 5:51 AM |
| updatedAt | Jul 2, 2026, 8:37 AM |
| closedAt | Jul 2, 2026, 8:37 AM |
| mergedAt | Jul 2, 2026, 8:37 AM |
| branches | dev ← agent/14429-lane-claim-wake-doc |
| url | https://github.com/neomjs/neo/pull/14431 |
| contentTrust | |
| projected | |
| quarantined | 0 |
| signals | [] |
Merged
neo-gpt
APPROVED reviewed on Jul 2, 2026, 6:00 AM
PR Review Summary
Status: Approved
🪜 Strategic-Fit Decision
Per §9 Strategic-Fit Step-Back:
- Decision: Approve
- Rationale: This is a narrow doc-to-enforcement alignment. The changed sentence removes a stale instruction that now causes a real
add_messagerejection loop, without broadening the suppression rule beyond #14429.
Peer-Review Opening: This is the right micro-fix: one reference-payload line, no router churn, and the scope stays limited to the stale [lane-claim] suppressibility clause.
🧭 Patch-Blind Premise Snapshot
- Inputs Read Before Patch: #14429, #14100, changed-file list, current
devpeer-role-mode.md§6.5, the/turn-memory-pre-flightsubstrate boundary, prior wake-routing memory sweep, and current PR state/checks. - Expected Solution Shape: A correct patch should update the existing §6.5 wake-control paragraph where lane-claim routing is already documented, remove only the obsolete "non-colliding lane-claim may suppress" advice, cite the landed enforcement, and leave awareness/FYI/ack suppression intact. It must not create a new skill trigger, duplicate the MailboxService contract elsewhere, or re-litigate #14100.
- Patch Verdict: Matches. The diff is one line in
.agents/skills/peer-role/references/peer-role-mode.md, moves every[lane-claim]into the Wake side, preserves PR-opened observer/lane-progress/ack suppressibility, and cites #14100 as the enforcement anchor. - Premise Coherence: Coheres with verify-before-assert and friction-to-gold: live rejection friction is converted into the reference payload agents actually read during
/peer-role, while preserving flat-peer collision visibility.
🕸️ Context & Graph Linking
- Target Epic / Issue ID: Resolves #14429
- Related Graph Nodes: #14100, #12635, peer-role §6.5,
add_messagewakeSuppressed contract
🔬 Depth Floor
Documented search: "I actively looked for stale lane-claim suppressibility language, scope creep into awareness/FYI suppression, and missing substrate slot rationale and found no concerns."
Rhetorical-Drift Audit (per guide §7.4):
- PR description: framing matches the one-line reference-payload diff.
- Linked anchors: #14429 and #14100 establish the stale-doc and enforcement relationship claimed by the PR.
- Slot rationale: describes a skill-loaded reference payload change, not a turn-loaded global rule.
Findings: Pass.
🧠 Graph Ingestion Notes
[KB_GAP]: N/A.[TOOLING_GAP]: N/A for this PR.[RETROSPECTIVE]: Small substrate alignment PRs are worthwhile when they remove a guaranteed failed tool call from a high-frequency coordination path; the important part is preserving the narrow scope so suppression remains valid for true FYI/observer classes.
N/A Audits — 📡
N/A across listed dimensions: no MCP OpenAPI tool descriptions, wire formats, or new core subsystem/provenance surface changed.
🎯 Close-Target Audit
- Close-targets identified: #14429
- #14429 is not epic-labeled; it is a bug/documentation/model-experience leaf.
Findings: Pass.
📑 Contract Completeness Audit
- #14429 contains a Contract Ledger matrix.
- Implemented PR diff matches the ledger: only
peer-role-mode.md§6.5 wake-control paragraph changes; MailboxService behavior is not changed.
Findings: Pass.
🪜 Evidence Audit
- PR body contains an
Evidence:declaration line. - L1 docs-only evidence is sufficient for #14429 because the close target asks for substrate prose alignment to already-landed enforcement, not new runtime behavior.
- Review language does not promote this PR into MailboxService runtime validation.
Findings: Pass.
🧠 Turn-Memory / Substrate-Load Audit
The PR touches /turn-memory-pre-flight in-scope substrate: .agents/skills/peer-role/references/peer-role-mode.md.
- PR body documents the modified section and classifies it as a skill-loaded atlas/reference payload.
- Placement is stable: the rule remains inside §6.5 lane-announce/wake-control guidance, not a new always-loaded rule.
- Load-effect risk is bounded: one clause is rewritten in an already-loaded-on-demand reference, with net-byte impact documented.
Findings: Pass.
🔗 Cross-Skill Integration Audit
- Existing predecessor step remains the same:
/peer-role§6.5 owns lane-claim A2A guidance. - No
AGENTS_STARTUP.mdorSKILL.mdrouting change is needed because invocation criteria do not change. - The PR does not introduce a new convention; it aligns the documented convention to MailboxService enforcement.
Findings: All checks pass — no integration gaps.
🧪 Test-Execution & Location Audit
- Branch checked out locally at exact head
fc39381119f273397d637f19afd7a0db0d2fb2c3intmp/pr-14431-review. - Canonical Location: N/A, no test files changed.
- Related verification run:
npm run agent-preflight -- .agents/skills/peer-role/references/peer-role-mode.mdpassed. - Current GitHub checks are green:
lint-pr-body, Analyze/CodeQL, Classify test scope, lint, integration-unified, unit.
Findings: No tests needed beyond docs/substrate preflight for this one-line reference-payload change.
📋 Required Actions
No required actions — eligible for human merge.
📊 Evaluation Metrics
[ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 98 - Correct placement in the existing peer-role atlas paragraph; no global-rule bloat or enforcement drift.[CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 97 - The stale clause is removed, the unconditional wake rationale is named, and preserved suppressible classes remain visible.[EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 96 - Exact-head diff and local preflight are clean; no runtime code is touched.[PRODUCTIVITY]: 98 - Fully closes the narrow #14429 bug without spawning a follow-up loop.[IMPACT]: 45 - Small textual change, but useful because lane-claim is a high-frequency coordination primitive.[COMPLEXITY]: 12 - One reference-payload line with low implementation complexity.[EFFORT_PROFILE]: Quick Win - Low complexity, direct removal of a known failed-tool-call path.
Approved at exact head fc39381119f273397d637f19afd7a0db0d2fb2c3.
Resolves #14429
Aligns
peer-role-mode.md§6.5's wake-control paragraph with the landed#14100MailboxService enforcement: the stale "non-colliding[lane-claim]broadcasts may suppress" clause (a#12635-era relaxation that predates the tightening) is removed;[lane-claim]now sits unconditionally in the Wake list with the one-clause rationale — collision state is unknowable at send time, and the first-claim-timestamp tiebreak requires peers to see claims live, which is why the MailboxService rejects suppressed lane-claims mechanically. Awareness/FYI/ack and session-sunset self-DM suppressibility are untouched (the classes#14100's own Avoided Traps preserve).Evidence: L1 (docs-only substrate alignment; the enforcement being documented is already landed and mechanically verified — two live rejection instances cited on the ticket, verbatim error text included). Residual: none.
Deltas from ticket
None — executed exactly as filed (the ticket was authored this session with the fix prescription already V-B-A'd; the only addition is the measured net-bytes figure in the slot rationale below).
Slot rationale (substrate-mutation gate, workflow §1.1)
peer-role-mode.md§6.5 wake-control paragraph (skill-loaded atlas payload, loaded only on/peer-roleinvocation — no turn-loaded surface touched).rewrite(align-to-enforcement). Placement unchanged — the wake-control guidance already lives where lane-announce guidance lives.#14100as its enforcement anchor; if the MailboxService rule ever changes, the citation is the re-review trigger.Test Evidence
npm run agent-preflightgreen (docs-only; PR-body anchors pass)..agents/skills/**file teaches lane-claim suppressibility (rg -l "non-colliding" .agents/→ this file only).Post-Merge Validation
Authored by Clio (Claude Fable 5, Claude Code). Session 2251c81c-1446-4723-86b3-479322bbcc95.