PR Review Summary

Status: Approved

🪜 Strategic-Fit Decision

Per §9 Strategic-Fit Step-Back:

• Decision: Approve
• Rationale: This is the narrow data-leaf split #14657 asked for: one dockZone.v1 document factory plus a focused validator/unit test. There is no debt-creating shortcut here; the projection and rail behavior stay in their sibling lanes.

Peer-Review Opening: Reviewed #14891 at exact head efc9c61f6d; this is shaped correctly for the FM cockpit dock document lane.

🧭 Patch-Blind Premise Snapshot

• Inputs Read Before Patch: #14657 live issue body and labels, PR changed-file list, learn/agentos/HarnessDockZoneModel.md, the current FM cockpit design SSOT search, exact-head diff for apps/agentos/view/fleet/cockpitDockDocument.mjs and test/playwright/unit/apps/agentos/cockpitDockDocument.spec.mjs, and CI status for head efc9c61f6de6d3b599bfd25f7323533e165a3925.
• Expected Solution Shape: A pure neo.harness.dockZone.v1 data document under the FM cockpit surface, returned fresh per call, validating through DockZoneModel.validate, declaring the primary fleet/activity zones and secondary autoHidden panes without projection, DOMRect, render, resize, or lifecycle wiring. Test isolation should be a unit spec that validates the document contract and inventory.
• Patch Verdict: Matches. The module returns a fresh v1 document, keeps projection wiring out of scope, declares detail and perspectives as autoHidden, and the unit spec validates schema, proportions, fresh-object behavior, and tabs item resolution.
• Premise Coherence: Coheres with verify-before-assert and the two-hemisphere split: this is authored substrate data with executable validation, not a UI/runtime projection shortcut.

🕸️ Context & Graph Linking

• Target Epic / Issue ID: Resolves #14657
• Related Graph Nodes: #14560, #14615, #14617, #14632, neo.harness.dockZone.v1, HarnessDockZoneModel

🔬 Depth Floor

Challenge OR documented search (per guide §7.1):

Documented search: I actively looked for runtime/projection leakage, shared mutable singleton aliasing, unresolved tabs item references, and accidental autoHidden on primary panes and found no concerns.

Rhetorical-Drift Audit (per guide §7.4):

• PR description: framing matches what the diff substantiates (no overshoot)
• Anchor & Echo summaries: precise codebase terminology, no metaphor or source-code snapshot anchor (ticket/PR/lane/AC/cycle/line number) that overshoots durable intent
• [RETROSPECTIVE] tag: accurately characterizes what shipped (no inflation of architectural significance)
• Linked anchors: cited tickets/PRs actually establish the claimed pattern (no borrowed authority)

Findings: Pass with a non-blocking wording note: the PR body's first paragraph says the fleet zone is beside the activity stream, while the implementation/test/module docs intentionally use a vertical fleet-over-activity split. The code, tests, and issue wording are internally coherent, so this is body wording cleanup only if the body is edited again.

🧠 Graph Ingestion Notes

• [KB_GAP]: N/A
• [TOOLING_GAP]: N/A
• [RETROSPECTIVE]: The dockZone default document is a good shape: a small pure-data factory with model validation and no render/runtime coupling.

🎯 Close-Target Audit

For every issue named as close-target, verify it does NOT carry the epic label:

• Close-targets identified: #14657
• For each #N: confirmed not epic-labeled (or flagged as Required Action below)

Findings: Pass — live #14657 labels are enhancement, developer-experience, ai; no epic label.

📑 Contract Completeness Audit

• Originating ticket (or parent epic) contains a Contract Ledger matrix
• Implemented PR diff matches the Contract Ledger exactly (no drift)

Findings: Pass for this consumed data surface. #14657 names the dockZone.v1 document contract explicitly, and the diff validates against DockZoneModel.validate with no invariant violations.

🪜 Evidence Audit

• PR body contains an Evidence: declaration line (or N/A justified inline)
• Achieved evidence ≥ close-target required evidence, OR residuals are explicitly listed in the PR's ## Residual / Post-Merge Validation section
• If residuals exist: close-target issue body has the residuals annotated as [L<N>-deferred — operator handoff needed]
• Two-ceiling distinction: PR body distinguishes "shipped at L because sandbox ceiling" from "shipped at L because author didn't probe further"
• Evidence-class collapse check: review language does NOT promote L1/L2 evidence to L3/L4 framing without explicit sandbox-ceiling caveat

Findings: Pass — close-target ACs are static/unit-contract ACs and the PR body declares L2 evidence with no residual.

📡 MCP-Tool-Description Budget Audit

Findings: N/A — no ai/mcp/server/*/openapi.yaml surface touched.

🔗 Cross-Skill Integration Audit

Findings: N/A — this PR adds cockpit data and tests; it does not introduce a new workflow convention, skill file, MCP tool, or loaded substrate rule.

🧪 Test-Execution & Location Audit

• Branch checked out locally (e.g., via checkout_pull_request MCP tool or gh pr checkout)
• Canonical Location: New/moved test files placed correctly per unit-test.md (e.g., test/playwright/unit/ai/mcp/server/)
• If a test file changed: Ran the specific test file.
• If code changed: Verified if there are tests, or if new tests are needed.

Findings: Pass. Exact head efc9c61f6d was checked out in tmp/review-14891; test/playwright/unit/apps/agentos/cockpitDockDocument.spec.mjs is the correct app unit-test location; npm run test-unit -- test/playwright/unit/apps/agentos/cockpitDockDocument.spec.mjs passed with 5 passed (31.0s). GitHub CI is green.

📋 Required Actions

No required actions — eligible for human merge.

📊 Evaluation Metrics

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 94 - Correctly keeps the dock document as data, in the cockpit surface, validated against the dockZone model with no projection/runtime coupling.
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 93 - Covers validation, proportions, inventory, autoHidden, and pure/fresh factory semantics.
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 94 - Focused implementation and unit coverage; exact-head local test and CI both pass.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 91 - Advances the Fleetmanager cockpit foundation without broadening the lane.
• [IMPACT]: 86 - Small but important substrate piece for the cockpit docking sequence.
• [COMPLEXITY]: 20 - Intentionally low-complexity pure-data leaf.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: Quick Win - Narrow document + validator coverage, correctly isolated from projection work.

Approved. The only follow-up-worthy item is wording hygiene in the PR body if it gets edited again; it is not a merge blocker.