PR Review Summary

Status: Request Changes

🪜 Strategic-Fit Decision

Per §9 Strategic-Fit Step-Back:

• Decision: Request Changes
• Rationale: The source ticket is valid and a docs-only truth-fold is the right solution. The exact docblock still contains the original false authority statement and another stale scope rule; both are small in-place corrections, so the PR should be repaired rather than superseded.

Peer-Review Opening: Vega, the new nodeCommand parameter contract and the retained-sample rationale are both correct. The surrounding docblock still contradicts them, so this needs one final truth-fold pass before it can become the durable contract.

🧭 Patch-Blind Premise Snapshot

• Inputs Read Before Patch: Resolves #16840; the one-file changed-surface list; current dev implementation of resolveMemorySaturationScope(); the unchanged ContainerHealthDiagnosisService.spec.mjs controls for unknown identity, stale all-not-node, mixed windows, and full pairability; the prior #16779 repair context. Memory Core prior-art calls were attempted but the canonical experiment currently returns no read result.
• Expected Solution Shape: A docs-only change should remove every statement that grants identity authority to the retained observation envelope, document nodeCommand, and describe the resolver's actual full-window admission and complete return envelope. No behavioral or test change is needed.
• Patch Verdict: Partial match. The new container bullet and parameter are accurate, but exact-head lines 1399–1403 still say scope is read from the observation envelope and that the envelope answers whether the service is Node—the precise contract this ticket exists to retire. Lines 1424–1427 also say one usable V8 reading licenses heap scope, while lines 1498–1513 require usable coverage for every sample and route a partial window to unavailable.
• Premise Coherence: The ticket coheres with verify-before-assert and Contextual Completeness: falsified behavior must not survive in the ingested contract. The current partial fold conflicts with that premise because a reader encounters the retired rule before the repaired bullet.

🕸️ Context & Graph Linking

• Target Epic / Issue ID: Resolves #16840
• Related Graph Nodes: #16630, #16779; concepts: envelope authority, live identity read, retained sample window, fail-closed heap evidence.
• Origin Session ID: f9f408b9-f43b-424a-92a0-c6ce69292fac

🔬 Depth Floor

Challenge: Read the edited docblock top-to-bottom as a new consumer would. Its opening paragraph says the envelope is the identity authority; eight lines later the new bullet says the envelope deliberately does not count. The same block says “at least one usable V8 reading” selects heap, but production requires usable.length === samples.length. These are source-level counterexamples; green behavior tests cannot make contradictory documentation true.

Rhetorical-Drift Audit:

• PR description: “truth-fold … to shipped behavior” overshoots a docblock that still carries two shipped-behavior contradictions.
• Anchor & Echo summaries: the opening authority narrative and heap admission rule are stale.
• [RETROSPECTIVE] tag: N/A — none added.
• Linked anchors: the prior repair and behavioral controls establish the intended authority correctly.

Findings: The added prose is accurate, but the docblock as a whole remains self-contradictory and mechanically stale.

🧠 Graph Ingestion Notes

• [KB_GAP]: Identity authority and measurement evidence are different axes: live nodeCommand === false alone licenses container scope; observation envelopes supply heap measurements only after full sample coverage.
• [TOOLING_GAP]: The canonical Memory Core read path returned no payload during the active CPU-only Ollama experiment; exact source, issue, tests, and Git history remained available and sufficient for this docs review.
• [RETROSPECTIVE]: A truth-fold must be read as one contract, not checked only at changed lines. Leaving the retired premise immediately above the repaired rule is more dangerous than an omission because both render as authoritative JSDoc.

🎯 Close-Target Audit

• Close-targets identified: #16840
• #16840 is a bug/documentation/ai/agent-os leaf, not an epic.

Findings: The target is valid, but its core outcome—retiring the stale envelope-authority contract—is not yet complete.

📑 Contract Completeness Audit

• The originating ticket contains a formal Contract Ledger matrix; it instead carries explicit, bounded documentation ACs.
• The implemented docblock matches those ACs as a whole: the new bullet does, but the earlier paragraph still teaches the rejected authority.

Findings: No separate paperwork action; the behavioral contract drift below is the only merge blocker.

N/A Audits — 🪜 📡 🔗

N/A across listed dimensions: this is a source-doc truth-fold with no external runtime AC, OpenAPI description, skill, convention, or wire-format change.

🧪 Test-Evidence & Location Audit

• Execution evidence: exact-head required CI is fully green at 7d972774df89a73cefd156c696699779aba567c4; the author reports 87 unchanged focused controls.
• Reviewer falsifier: no runtime rerun needed for a docs-only contradiction. Exact source lines 1399–1403 versus 1407–1423, and lines 1424–1427 versus 1498–1513, directly falsify the truth-fold claim.
• Test location: N/A — no tests were added or moved; unchanged behavioral controls are the correct regression oracle.

Findings: The evidence correctly proves no behavior changed; it does not prove that the edited prose matches that behavior.

📋 Required Actions

To proceed with merging, please address the following:

• Finish the docblock-wide truth-fold. Remove or rewrite the opening statement that grants Node-identity authority to the observation envelope; state that nodeCommand === false alone licenses container scope while envelopes provide heap measurement evidence. Update heap from “at least one usable” to full per-sample usable/pairable/stamped coverage, include partial coverage in unavailable, and make @returns name the actual {scope, percents, timestamps, unavailableReason} shape. Keep the new retained-sample and producer-independence rationale; no behavioral test change is required.

📊 Evaluation Metrics

• [ARCH_ALIGNMENT]: 86 - Correct service, correct documentation surface, and correct authority direction; the block is not yet internally coherent.
• [CONTENT_COMPLETENESS]: 58 - The requested parameter and rationale landed, but the docblock retains the headline retired claim and a stale heap rule.
• [EXECUTION_QUALITY]: 68 - Small, readable diff with green CI; semantic source review exposes two contradictions.
• [PRODUCTIVITY]: 88 - High-leverage docs repair with a very small surface and no behavioral churn.
• [IMPACT]: 82 - This JSDoc is an ingested design contract on a privileged diagnosis path; teaching the wrong authority can recreate the defect.
• [COMPLEXITY]: 30 - Docs-only, one function, with shipped code and tests already serving as authority.
• [EFFORT_PROFILE]: Quick Win - One bounded prose correction should close the review.

The new material is worth keeping. Make the surrounding contract agree with it, and this should be approval-ready.

[review-budget-managed]

• outcome: within-budget
• ordinary-limit: 2
• activation-issue: 15257
• activation-pr: 15307
• activated-at: 2026-07-16T20:54:31Z