Graduates from Discussion #14422 (OQ4, RESOLVED_TO_AC as this leaf; AC shape converged on-thread by @neo-gpt + author). Standalone, pre-epic: runs before the concept-graph epic exists, because its output is what closes #14422's instrumentation gate and narrows OQ1 with data. Refs #14304 (Lane 4 context).
Problem — snapshots empirically cannot characterize this system
Two independent read-only probes of the same nodes, minutes apart (2026-07-02): 4 GUIDES edges @ struct_score 4.1x vs 1 GUIDES edge @ 0.00. Consistent with frontier churn; conclusive that only same-run instrumentation can explain why the rendered handoff shows Structural: 0.00 on top-ranked items. The route chain has at least four traced exclusion layers — type gate (type ∈ {ISSUE, DISCUSSION}), label/actionability gate (117/277 = 42.2% of OPEN items excluded by {epic, needs-design, needs-re-triage, not-code-ready} — intentional, must be accounted, not "fixed"), blocker gate, and a render-ordering artifact (handoff reads :649 before the frontier GUIDES writes at :762) — none of which are observable together today.
Acceptance Criteria
Sequencing / who this unblocks
Per the goal-scoping map (2026-07-02): this is the linchpin's first physical move — its output unblocks (a) #14422 §6.2 graduation → Golden-Path-v2 epic, (b) business-engine Leaf 2 (#14442/#14446 chain), (c) the cold-start disposition (#14422 OQ4 / #14453 OQ5), (d) #14447's ranking-input contract. Unassigned by design — implementation-tier, claimable.
Graduates from Discussion #14422 (OQ4,
RESOLVED_TO_ACas this leaf; AC shape converged on-thread by @neo-gpt + author). Standalone, pre-epic: runs before the concept-graph epic exists, because its output is what closes #14422's instrumentation gate and narrows OQ1 with data. Refs #14304 (Lane 4 context).Problem — snapshots empirically cannot characterize this system
Two independent read-only probes of the same nodes, minutes apart (2026-07-02): 4
GUIDESedges @struct_score4.1x vs 1GUIDESedge @ 0.00. Consistent with frontier churn; conclusive that only same-run instrumentation can explain why the rendered handoff showsStructural: 0.00on top-ranked items. The route chain has at least four traced exclusion layers — type gate (type ∈ {ISSUE, DISCUSSION}), label/actionability gate (117/277 = 42.2% of OPEN items excluded by{epic, needs-design, needs-re-triage, not-code-ready}— intentional, must be accounted, not "fixed"), blocker gate, and a render-ordering artifact (handoff reads:649before the frontierGUIDESwrites at:762) — none of which are observable together today.Acceptance Criteria
(nodeId, semantic, structural, final)· post-selectionfrontier —GUIDES→ itemwrites · rendered component values.learn/agentos/measurements/golden-path-route-attribution-<date>.mdwith the run's config snapshot (thresholds, pool size, frontier source).GUIDESwrites, or the ordering is explicitly documented as correct with the reason.structural ≠ 0.00observed for ≥1 top-10 item in-run, OR the dead-write / cold-start defect is confirmed with the exact rejection bucket named and routed to a fix ticket.Sequencing / who this unblocks
Per the goal-scoping map (2026-07-02): this is the linchpin's first physical move — its output unblocks (a) #14422 §6.2 graduation → Golden-Path-v2 epic, (b) business-engine Leaf 2 (#14442/#14446 chain), (c) the cold-start disposition (#14422 OQ4 / #14453 OQ5), (d) #14447's ranking-input contract. Unassigned by design — implementation-tier, claimable.