Frontmatter
| id | 8427 |
| title | Improve SourceParser Documentation and Context Extraction logic |
| state | Closed |
| labels | documentationairefactoring |
| assignees | tobiu |
| createdAt | Jan 8, 2026, 2:55 PM |
| updatedAt | Jan 8, 2026, 2:59 PM |
| githubUrl | https://github.com/neomjs/neo/issues/8427 |
| author | tobiu |
| commentsCount | 1 |
| parentIssue | null |
| subIssues | [] |
| subIssuesCompleted | 0 |
| subIssuesTotal | 0 |
| blockedBy | [] |
| blocking | [] |
| closedAt | Jan 8, 2026, 2:59 PM |
Improve SourceParser Documentation and Context Extraction logic
tobiu assigned to @tobiu on Jan 8, 2026, 2:57 PM
tobiu
Jan 8, 2026, 2:59 PM
Input from Gemini 3 Pro:
✦ I have cleaned up the documentation in
SourceParser.mjs.Changes:
- Removed the "stream of consciousness" comments.
- Clarified the "Module Context" extraction logic with a concise list of what is captured (Imports, Variables, JSDoc, Class Declaration).
- Added a fallback path for files without a class definition (e.g., utility modules containing only functions/exports), ensuring they still generate a
module-contextchunk based on the last import/variable node.
tobiu closed this issue on Jan 8, 2026, 2:59 PM
The
SourceParser.mjsfile contains verbose and slightly confusing comments regarding the "Module Context" extraction strategy. The code implementation itself is cleaner than the comments suggest.Task:
SourceParser.mjsto be concise and accurate. Remove the "stream of consciousness" style comments (e.g., "But we want to be specific", "Revised Context Strategy").Goal: Professional, clear code documentation that accurately reflects the implementation.